Development and psychometric properties of DSM-5 based diagnostic questionnaire for specific learning disorder with specifiers: Reading, writing and mathematics (Teacher Form).

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Psychology and education of exceptional children, Allameh Tabataba'i University.

2 Professor, Department of Assessment and Measurement, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

3 master in assessment and evaluation, Allameh Tabataba'i, Iran, tehran

4 assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Education of children with Special Needs, Faculty of education and psychology, university of Isfahan, Isfahan. Iran

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to build, validate, and examine the instrumental psychometric characteristics for diagnosing Specific Learning Disorders (Teacher Form).
Methods: Sampling was done using the multistage cluster method. The sample consisted of 304 students from grades one to five of Tehran’s primary schools. Students had already received a diagnosis of learning disorders in learning disability centers. The following steps were taken to make this questionnaire: 1. Reviewal of theoretical foundations. 2. Preparation of the statements repository according to DSM-5. 3.Initial test implementation, 4. Creation of a 42 item questionnaire consisting of two sections (a) SLD Questionnaire ( 9 items) (b) reading, writing, and Math specifier Questionnaire (33 items) 5.Two stages of implementation; concurrently with determining the statistical characteristics and the validity of preliminary implementation on 50 people to determine the initial reliability and subsequent implementation on 304 people, 6.Calculation of the credit coefficient (Cronbach alpha) of the questionnaire.
Results: The results showed that in the primary section, the credit coefficient of the specific learning disorder questionnaire was 72% and the credit coefficient (Cronbach alpha) calculated in the second part (specifiers of reading, writing, and math) was 3/87. The final statistical results led to the removal of 3 items in the specifier section. Eventually, the main questionnaire with 39 items remained intact.
Conclusion: The general results showed that the high average of the components was acceptable due to the implementation of the questionnaire for students with learning disorders, and are capable of initially identifying and diagnosing the disorder.

Keywords


بهراد، ب. (۱۳۸۴). فراتحلیل ‌شیوع ناتوانی‌های‌ یادگیری ‌در دانش‌آموزان ‌ابتدایی ایران. فصلنامه کودکان استثنایی، 5(4)، 417- 436.   http://joec.ir/article-1-420-en.html
محمد اسماعیل، ا و هومن، ح.ع. (1381). انطباق و هنجاریابی آزمون ریاضیات ایران کی مت. مجله پژوهش در حیطه کودکان استثنایی، 6،  323- 332.  http://joec.ir/article-1-477-en.html
References
Al-Yagon, M., Cavendish, W., Cornoldi, C., Fawcett, A. J., Grünke, M., Hung, L. Y., & Vio, C. (2013). The proposed changes for DSM-5 for SLD and ADHD: International perspectives—Australia, Germany, Greece, India, Israel, Italy, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States. Journal of learning disabilities, 46(1), 58-72.  [DOI.org/10.1177/0022219412464353]
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and stastitical manual of mental Disorder Edition: DSM-5. New York. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/pra ctice/dsm. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/pra ctice/dsm
Behrad, B. (2006). Prevalence of learning disabilities in Iranian primary students: A meta- analysis. JOEC, 5 (4): 417-436. (Persian). http://joec.ir/article-1-420-en.html
Görker, I., Bozatli, L., Korkmazlar, Ü., Karadağ, M. Y., Ceylan, C., Söğüt, C., ... & Turan, N. (2017). The probable prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of specific learning disorder in primary school children in Edirne. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 54(4), 343. [DOI.org/10.5152/npa.2016.18054]
Hale, J., Alfonso, V., Berninger, V., Bracken, B., Christo, C., Clark, E., & Yalof, J. (2010). Critical issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: An expert white paper consensus. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(3), 223-236. [Doi.org/10.1177/0731948710033003]
‏‫ Jakobson, A., & Kikas, E. (2007). Cognitive functioning in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with and without comorbid learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities40(3), 194-202. [DOI.org/10.1177/00222194070400030101]
Lovett, M. W., Frijters, J. C., Wolf, M., Steinbach, K. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Morris, R. D. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 889. [DOI.org/10.1037/edu0000181]
‏‫Moll, K., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Bruder, J., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2014). Specific learning disorder: Prevalence and gender differences. PLoS one, 9(7), e103537.  [DOI.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103537].
‏Mohammadesmaeil, E., & Hooman, H. A. (2003). Adaptation and standardization of the IRAN KEY-MATH test of mathematics. Journal of Exceptional Children2(4), 323-332.  http://joec.ir/article-1-477-en.html
Nkoana, W., Williams, H., Steenkamp, N., Clasby, B., Knowler, H., & Schrieff, L. (2020). Understanding the educational needs of young offenders: A prevalence study of traumatic brain injury and learning disabilities. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102261. [DOI.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102261]
Savatt, J. M., & Myers, S. M. (2021). Genetic Testing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 19; 9: 526779. [DOI.org/10.3389/fped.2021.526779]
Taanila, A., Yliherva, A., Kaakinen, M., Moilanen, I., & Ebeling, H. (2011). An epidemiological study on Finnish school-aged children with learning difficulties and behavioural problems. International journal of circumpolar health, 70(1), 59-71. [DOI.org/10.3402/ijch.v70i1.17799]
Wenz-Gross, M., & Siperstein, G. N. (1998). Students with Learning Problems at Risk in Middle School: Stress, Social Support, and Adjustment. Exceptional Children, 65(1), 91-100. [DOI.org/10.1177/001440299806500107]