محتوای دیجیتال مناسب برای افراد نارساخوان: مرور سیستماتیک

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ملایر، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: انواع مختلف محتوای دیجیتال تأثیر مهمی در تمام جنبه های زندگی انسان از جمله آموزش دارند. این رسانه می تواند با تلفیق خلاقانۀ دانش و مهارت معلمی، تسلط بر مفاهیم و مهارت های فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در آموزش، و شناخت دقیق ماهیت و ریشه های اختلالی همچون نارساخوانی اثرات منفی آن را کنترل کرده و کاهش دهد. هدف پژوهش حاضر جستجوی ویژگی های محتواهای دیجیتال متناسب با دانش آموزان نارساخوان بر مبنای نتایج پژوهشی است.
روش ها: در این راستا با استفاده از روش مرور سیستماتیک، ویژگی های محتوای دیجیتال متناسب با افراد نارساخوان با توجه به نتایج پژوهشی معتبر جستجو شده است. با توجه به هدف پژوهش، مقالات داوری شده و منتشر شده بین سال‌های 2000 تا 2020 با استفاده از کلیدواژه‌های تعیین شده در میان منابع فارسی و انگلیسی و در پایگاه‌هایISC ، web of science، Eric، Sid، Irandoc و Magiran؛ طی شش مرحله بطور سیستماتیک بررسی شدند.
یافته‌ها: ویژگی های استخراج شده مربوط به محتوای دیجیتال متناسب با افراد نارساخوان در چهار بعد رسانه ای: 1. نوشتار، 2. صدا، 3. تصویر، و 4. تعامل طبقه بندی شدند. این نتایج در نهایت در قالب چک لیستی تنظیم و روایی صوری آن تأیید شد.
نتیجه گیری: با توجه به این ویژگی ها می توان دستورالعملی دقیق برای تولیدکنندگان و طراحان انواع محتواهای دیجیتال به دست داد. همچنین، ارزیابی محتواهای دیجیتال با توجه به این قواعد، خوانایی و انتقال مؤثرتر مضامین به افراد نارساخوان را تقویت خواهد کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Suitable Digital Content for Dyslexics: A Systematic Review

نویسنده [English]

  • Haniyeh Kalantari Dehaghi
Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: Different types of digital content have important effect in all aspects of human life, including education. This media can help control and reduce the negative effects of dyslexia by creatively combining the knowledge and skill of the teacher, correctly understanding the nature and roots of dyslexia, and mastering the concepts and skills of information and communication technology in education. The purpose of this research was inquiry of suitable digital content characteristics for dyslexic students, based on research results.
Methods: In this regard, using the systematic review method, the characteristics of suitable digital content for dyslexics have been searched according to valid research results. According to the purpose of the research, refereed and published articles, between 2000 and 2020 using identified keywords, among Persian and English sources, and in ISC, Web of Science, Eric, Sid, Irandoc and Magiran databases were reviewed during six stages of systematic review.
Results: Extracted characteristics of suitable digital content for dyslexics were categorized into six media dimensions: 1. Text, 2. Audio, 3. Picture, & 4. Interaction. These results were finally set in the form of checklist and its face validity was confirmed.
Conclusion: According to these characteristics, it is possible to give detailed instructions for the develpers & designers of all types of digital content. Also, evaluation of digital content according to these rules will help readability and more effective transmission of concepts to dyslexics

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Digital content
  • Dyslexia
  • systematic review
عباسی، ف.، کلانتری دهقی، ه و نوری، ع. (۱۴۰۰). فراتحلیل تاثیر مداخله های فناوری محور بر کاهش اختلال خواندن دانش آموزان، فصلنامه کودکان استثنایی، ۲۱(۲)، ۵-۱۹. http://joec.ir/article-1-1276-en.html
حسینی، ف و غیاثی،پ. (1390). اختلال خواندن. چاپ اول، تهران: ساوالان.
مایر، ریچارد، ای (2011). یادگیری چندرسانه‌ای. (ترجمه مهسا موسوی،1384). اسلام شهر: موسسه عالی آموزش و تحقیقات و برنامه‌ریزی.
معین ­الغربائی، ف.، اسلامی، م و فدائی، م. (1394). شیوع ناتوانی‌های خاص یادگیری در دانش‌آموزان دوره ابتدائی استان خراسان شمالی. ناتوانی­ های یادگیری، 5(1)، 101-124.        http://jld.uma.ac.ir/article_366.html?lang=en
References
Abbasi F., Kalantari Dehaghi H., & Noori A. (2021). Meta-analysis of Technology-based Interventions for Improving Students' Reading Disorder. JOEC, 21 (2), 5-2. [Doi: 20.1001.1.16826612.1400.21.2.2.2]
Al-Wabil, A., Zaphiris, P., & Wilson, S. (2007, July). Web navigation for individuals with dyslexia: an exploratory study. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 593-602). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_66
Aziz, F. A., Husni, H., & Jamaludin, Z. (2013). Translating interaction design guidelines for dyslexic children’s reading application, II, 3-6.
Bhattacharya, A. (2020). Addressing Word Recognition Difficulties of Adolescents with Dyslexia: Phonological Awareness and Reading Fluency. InSpecial Education Design and Development Tools for School Rehabilitation Professionals. (pp. 21-37). IGI Global. http://www.ldonline.org/article/10784/
Brakstad, M. V. (2014). Language development in children at-risk of dyslexia-A study on the oral lanugage of children with weak reading and writing skills (Master's thesis, NTNU). https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/299247/master%20thesis%20marit%20valand%20brakstad.pdf?sequence=1
Briitish Dyslexia association. (2018). Dyslexia Style Guide 2018: Creating Dyslexia Friendly Content. https://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/advice/employers/creating-a-dyslexia-friendly-workplace/dyslexia-friendly-style-guide
Brunswick, N. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across dierent languages. InReading and dyslexia in different orthographies. Jun 10 (pp. 149-172). Psychology Press.
Chyl, K., Kossowski, B., Dębska, A., Łuniewska, M., Marchewka, A., Pugh, K. R., & Jednoróg, K. (2019). Reading acquisition in children: developmental processes and dyslexia-specific effects. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry58(10), 948-960. [Doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.11.007]
Daud, S. M., & Abas, H. (2013, December). 'Dyslexia Baca'Mobile App--The Learning Ecosystem for Dyslexic Children. In 2013 international conference on advanced computer science applications and technologies (pp. 412-416). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6836616
Goldstein, B. H., & Obrzut, J. E. (2001). Neuropsychological treatment of dyslexia in the classroom setting. Journal of learning Disabilities, 34(3), 276-285. t[Doi: 10.1177/002221940103400307]
Hsu, J. L. (2013). Exploring the relationships between the use of text message language and the literacy skills of dyslexic and normal students. Research in developmental disabilities34(1), 423-430.
International Dyslexia Association (IDA, 2019). Dyslexia Basics. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/dyslexia-basics-2/
Ismail, R., & Jaafar, A. (2014). Important features in text presentation for children with dyslexia. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 63(3), 694-700. http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol63No3/16Vol63No3.pdf
Kast, M., Baschera, G. M., Gross, M., Jäncke, L., & Meyer, M. (2011). Computer-based learning of spelling skills in children with and without dyslexia. Annals of dyslexia61(2), 177-200.
Khakhar, J., & Madhvanath, S. (2010, November). Jollymate: Assistive technology for young children with dyslexia. In 2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (pp. 576-580). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5693625
Lin, C. Y. & Chai, H. C. (2014, August). Using an e-talk pen to promote phonological awareness on communication training. In 2014 9th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (pp. 298-302). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6926474
Moinalghorabaie, F., Islami, M., Fadaee, M. (2015). Prevalence of learning disabilities among primary school students in north khorasan province. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5(1), 101-124.
Mayer R. E. (2011). Multimedia Learning, Mahsa Mousavi (Persian translator); Trhran: The Institute for Management and Planning Studies.
Mullan, E. (19 December 2011). "What is Digital Content?". EContent Magazine. Information Today Inc.
Newman, M. & Gough D. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. In: Zawacki-Richter O., Kerres M., Bedenlier S., Bond M., Buntins K. (eds) Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. [Doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1]
O’Brien, B.A., Mansfield, J.S., and Legge, G.E. (2000). The effect of contrast on reading speed in dyslexia. Vision research 40, 14, 1921–1935. [Doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00041-9]
Rello, L. & Baeza-Yates, R. (2012, April). Lexical quality as a proxy for web text understandability. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591-592). [Doi: 10.1145/2187980.2188142]
Rello, L. (2015). Dyslexia and web accessibility: ynergies and challenges. In Proc. of W4A.
Rello, L. and Baeza-Yates, R. (2013). Good Fonts for Dyslexia. Proc. of ASSETS ‘13, ACM, 14:1–14:8.
Rello, L. & Baeza-Yates, R. (2014, April). Evaluation of Dyswebxia: A reading app designed for people with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference (pp. 1-10). [Doi: 10.1145/2596695.2596697]
Rello, L., and Baeza-Yates, R. (2016). The effect of font type on screen readability by people with dyslexia. ACM Trans. Access.Comput. [Doi: 10.1145/2897736]
Rello, L., and Baeza-Yates, R. (2017). How to present more readable text for people with dyslexia. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10209-015-0438-8
Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., Bott, S., & Saggion, H. (2013, May). Simplify or help? Text simplification strategies for people with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (pp. 1-10). [Doi: 10.1145/2461121.2461126]
Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., Dempere-Marco, L., & Saggion, H. (2013, September). Frequent words improve readability and short words improve understandability for people with dyslexia. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 203-219). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Rello, L., Bautista, S., Baeza-Yates, R., Gervás, P., Hervás, R., & Saggion, H. (2013, September). One half or 50%? An eye-tracking study of number representation readability. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 229-245). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-40498-6_17
Rello, L., Bayarri, C., Otal, Y., & Pielot, M. (2014, October). A computer-based method to improve the spelling of children with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility (pp. 153-160). [Doi: 10.1145/2661334.2661373]
Rello, L., Kanvinde, G., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2012). A mobile application for displaying more accessible eBooks for people with Dyslexia. Procedia Computer Science, 14, 226-233. [Doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.026]
Rello, L., Kanvinde, G., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2012, April). Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility (pp. 1-9). [Doi: 10.1145/2207016.2207048]
Rello, L., Pielot, M. Marcos, M. C. & Carlini. R. (2013). Size matters (spacing not): 18 points for a dyslexic-friendly Wikipedia. In Proc. W4A ’13, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rello, L.; Ballesteros, M.; and Bigham, J. P. (2015). A spellchecker for dyslexia. In Proc. of ASSETS.
Rello, L.; Pielot, M.; and Marcos, M.-C. (2016). Make it big!: The effect of font size and line spacing on online readability. In Proc. of CHI. [Doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858204]
Reynolds, L., & Wu, S. (2018, June). “I’m Never Happy with What I Write”: Challenges and strategies of people with dyslexia on social media. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
Santana, V. F., Oliveira, R., Almeida, L. D. A., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2012, April). Web accessibility and people with dyslexia: a survey on techniques and guidelines. In Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility (pp. 1-9). [Doi: 10.1145/2207016.2207047]
Santana, V. F., Oliveira, R., Almeida, L. D. A. & Ito, M. (2013). Firefixia: An accessibility web browser customization toolbar for people with dyslexia. In Proc. W4A ’13, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sarpudin, S. N. S., & Zambri, S. (2014, September). Web readability for students with Dyslexia: Malaysian case study. In 2014 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr) (pp. 192-197). IEEE. [Doi: 10.1109/IUSER.2014.7002701]
Schiavo, G., & Buson, V. (2014, June). Interactive e-Books to support reading skills in dyslexia. In at IBOOC2014-2nd Workshop on Interactive eBook for Children at IDC.
Schneps, M.H., Thomson, J.M., Chen, C., Sonnert, G., and Pomplun, M. (2013). E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia. PLoS ONE 8, 9, e75634. [Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075634]
Schneps, M.H., Thomson, J.M., Sonnert, G., Pomplun, M., Chen, C., and Heffner-Wong, (2013). A Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle. PLoS ONE 8, 8 e71161. [Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071161]
Smythe, I., Everatt, J., & Salter, R. (2005). The international book of dyslexia: A guide to practice and resources. John Wiley & Sons.
Snowling, M. J., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D. C., Hayiou‐Thomas, M. E., Hulme, C., & Wellcome Language and Reading Project Team. (2019). Developmental outcomes for children at high risk of dyslexia and children with developmental language disorder. Child development90(5), e548-e564. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13216
Srivastava, B., & Haider, M. T. U. (2020). Personalized assessment model for alphabets learning with learning objects in e-learning environment for dyslexia. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 32(7), 809-817. [Doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.11.005]
Taileb, M., Al-saggaf, R., & Al-ghamdi, A.  (2013). YUSR: Speech Recognition Software for Dyslexics, 296-303.
Waterfield, J. (2002). Dyslexia: Implications for Learning, Teaching and Support, Planet, 6:1, 22-24.
Wu, S., Reynolds, L., Li, X., & Guzmán, F. (2019, May). Design and evaluation of a social media writing support tool for people with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14). [Doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300746]
Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, I., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109(28), 11455-11459. [Doi: 10.1073/pnas.120556610